507A7B86-7507-41CB-8F0A-9AD191E32DA5 513D0B9D-7474-4D61-863F-70F1B3696FB7 60F0322F-B5F4-4A4F-B505-A8773B90F3B9 Comments A5B32EC7-3D41-482F-8D63-40B8CC4B0807 86DDA3D7-F193-4FF9-BE89-5AF7F4C92A8F 1FAE3C2F-8600-47BE-8D04-C46DC4FFD6B0 47ACF625-4F24-4613-9C4E-5E81CABE1FBA FB57FEB0-874D-4585-BF2D-FAAE8EBC17F6 AD97905C-02C9-4A07-9EEA-DA1F36CC7FA8 8727CDE7-CFD1-40EA-A8AF-256882E677CA B052573C-CEE4-4CD1-B86F-C9CB0202622C 1FDA88B9-6396-4BE0-B01D-4DC4FA38A632 6CD0F19E-3C61-44FC-9723-C7737416CD7C 62D3F811-1C6C-477C-972B-FE52539070FC•• 1FAE3C2F-8600-47BE-8D04-C46DC4FFD6B0 47ACF625-4F24-4613-9C4E-5E81CABE1FBA FB57FEB0-874D-4585-BF2D-FAAE8EBC17F6 EF459BAF-1347-4C71-9008-BDB3136FCCE8 3BB10396-3999-4821-82D8-3568DE598D06 F3D95CB7-5CF3-4B27-8B55-AA78EDF89759 63057605-E453-4FDE-89BC-ABD2BC6600E2 Views 6CD0F19E-3C61-44FC-9723-C7737416CD7C

Cookie settings

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Cookie policy

    image image

    Responsible investment in fixed income quarterly update

    Responsible investment in fixed income update

    October 20, 2020 Responsible investment, Fixed income


    The divergence between US and European attitudes to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors continued in the third quarter, as the US Department of Labor proposed further rules preventing some fiduciaries from voting on issues with a non-financial impact, while sovereigns in Europe issued new impact bonds and the European Central Bank signaled it would allow sustainability-linked bonds in its asset purchase programme. Growth in impact bonds continued, with year-to-date 2020 issuance now ahead of issuance throughout 2019. Insight continued to engage with issuers over ESG matters, and to analyze impact bonds.

    For more information on our approach to responsible investment, please visit our dedicated responsible investment page.



    • Sovereigns step up to the impact bond market, as Germany and Sweden issue their first green bonds and Luxembourg becomes the first European country to launch a sustainability bond framework
    • In the US, the Department of Labor proposed further restrictions on some pension plan fiduciaries that could limit the consideration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in voting and engagement decision
    • The European Central Bank (ECB) signaled its support for innovation in sustainable finance, extending eligibility for its asset purchase programme to include sustainability-linked bonds

    Regulatory and industry news

    • Sovereigns starting to play a bigger role in impact bond issuance: Germany and Sweden became the latest sovereigns to come to market with green bond issuances of €6.5bn and kr20bn, respectively. Germany’s inaugural issuance was over five times oversubscribed. The next day, German carmaker giant Daimler also announced the issuance of its first green bond. Separately, Luxembourg raised €1.77bn with Europe’s first ever sovereign sustainability bond, dividing the proceeds between green and social projects.

    • US Department of Labor proposes yet more restrictions on ESG investments: Following the Department’s action to restrict some fiduciaries’ considerations of ESG factors in their investment decisions earlier in the year, it proposed an additional set of rules that could further limit the engagement of fiduciaries on ESG matters. The proposal states that Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plan fiduciaries should either abstain from voting in shareholder matters related to non-financial factors altogether, or policies should be put in place that require fiduciary votes to default to the management recommendation – therefore ensuring that ERISA plan fiduciaries are driven only by financial considerations.1

    • ECB plans on buying back sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) with coupon step-up from 1 January 2021: The ECB announced it would accept SLBs as collateral and as eligible for its asset purchase programme, provided that the SLBs comply with specific criteria. The programme-specific criteria, which previously excluded SLBs due to their linking of coupons to an issuer’s sustainability profile and thus rendering the coupon structure “a priori uncertain”, will now be extended to incorporate sustainability performance targets. 2

    • A series of ‘firsts’ for SLB issuance, with the first-ever SLB issuance from emerging market, the luxury goods sector and the healthcare industry: Suzano, the Brazilian pulp and paper producer, issued US$750m of SLBs in September, with coupons linked to meeting greenhouse gas emission targets. This is the first SLB the market has seen from an emerging market issuer. Other firsts included Chanel marking the luxury goods sector’s debut SLB issuance of €600m, and Novartis issuing the first SLB issuance in healthcare, totaling €1.85bn linked to patient access targets. The issuances came after the International Capital Market Association set out its best-practice principles for SLB issuance earlier in the year.

    • Launch of Task Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD): A broad range of financial institutions, governments, regulators and UN-affiliated agencies launched the TNFD, which aims to coordinate a unified global response to nature-related financial risks. The framework aims to develop broader disclosures than the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). Through the development of an international reporting standard, the TNFD aims to cater to the nature-related reporting, metrics and data needs of financial institutions.3

    Insight Investment analysis reflecting ESG factors in Q3 2020

    Sector Asset class ESG risk factor Comments Investment decision Insight ESG rating
    Real estate Active Governance Key-man risk materialized as an individual responsible for improvements in governance and transparency was leaving the firm. This, coupled with a complex governance structure, led us to view the investment opportunity negatively and we sold our remaining holdings. SELL
    Apparel Active All A new issuer to the market, this was identified as best-in-class under our ESG ratings with a robust sustainability framework. We decided to buy its new sustainability issuance. BUY
    Insurance Buy & maintain All Having been identified as worst-in-class under our ESG ratings, we moved to a ‘hold’ position for this company while our analyst engaged with management on material ESG concerns including responsible investment and carbon financing. HOLD 5
    Retail Buy & maintain All The company was downgraded to a 5 under our ESG ratings. We moved to a ‘hold’ position while our analyst engages with the company on material ESG concerns including labor management and anti-competitive practices. HOLD 5

    This is an illustrative list of implemented investment decisions that were affected primarily by ESG factors, selected to demonstrate the role of ESG analysis in our research and decision-making. 1= high ESG rating; 5 = low ESG rating.

    Impact bond issuance in Q3 2020

    A note on responsible investment and impact bonds: Investing responsibly means taking ESG risks into account across all portfolios. Impact bonds may bear similar ESG risks to traditional bonds. Investing in them does not mean you are necessarily taking a more responsible approach, but they can be an effective way to have a positive environmental or social impact with your investments.

    Total issuance (USD) by sector and by year

    Total issuance (USD) by sector and by year

    Total issuance (USD) by sector and by year - chart 2

    Largest impact bond issues in Q3 20205

    Issuer Issue type Size of issue Bond type
    Bundesrepublik Deutschland Bundesanleihe Government €7.67bn Green
    Sweden Government International Bond Government kr2.28bn Green
    NRW bank Financial or Banks €1.13bn Social
    Council of Europe Development Bank Supranational Bank €1.09bn Social
    Caisse Francaise de Financement Local Government €1.08bn Social

    Insight impact bonds ratings in Q3 2020

    Our traffic light ratings indicate how impactful we believe bonds to be. The ratings are taken into consideration when forming investment decisions. Our analysis of 32 impact bonds issued in Q3 2020 resulted in the following ratings:

    bonds were rated green, indicating the bond meets Insight’s minimum sustainability requirements
    bonds were rated amber, indicating there are weaknesses in the bond with regard to sustainability
    bonds were rated red, indicating the bond does not meet Insight’s minimum sustainability requirements

    Sample of Insight Investment's impact bond analysis in Q3 2020

    Company industry Bond type ESG performance met? Bond framework criteria met? Impact criteria met? Traffic light score
    Real estate Social Yes Yes Yes
    Analyst assessment: The bond’s proceeds may be used for accessing essential services through investment in hospital and elderly care real estate in France. We rated this bond amber. This could have been a green rating as it ticks the boxes in terms of the key pillars of a framework and the company has an opportunity to create clear social impact. However, it appears to be refinancing a larger proportion of the proceeds, which in our view is less impactful.


    Company industry Bond type ESG performance met? Bond framework criteria met? Impact criteria met? Traffic light score
    Sovereign Green Yes Yes Yes
    Analyst assessment: The bond’s proceeds may be used for: international co-operation (assisting developing countries with the transition to low carbon economy); energy and industry (applied research on renewables and measures to increase sustainable heating/cooling); agriculture, forestry, natural landscapes and biodiversity (forest protection, extreme weather management, organic farming); research, innovation and awareness raising (support/facilitate knowledge and innovation on the climate/environment such as biodiversity and nature protection). We rated this bond green. The framework is very clear and detailed, providing sufficient transparency on how the proceeds would be split across each category with clear impact.


    Company industry Bond type ESG performance met? Bond framework criteria met? Impact criteria met? Traffic light score
    Automotive Green No Yes Yes
    Analyst assessment: The bond’s proceeds may be used for clean transportation (primarily funding electric vehicles and related charging infrastructure). We rated this bond amber. The issuer remains to be a UN Global Compact violator and has a worst-in-class ESG rating, and therefore does not meet the criteria to be rated green. However, the framework is clear and in line with the market standard.
    Back to top