507A7B86-7507-41CB-8F0A-9AD191E32DA5 64A7790B-23B8-4FDB-B6C9-BC79573952FF 513D0B9D-7474-4D61-863F-70F1B3696FB7 60F0322F-B5F4-4A4F-B505-A8773B90F3B9 Comments A5B32EC7-3D41-482F-8D63-40B8CC4B0807 86DDA3D7-F193-4FF9-BE89-5AF7F4C92A8F 1FAE3C2F-8600-47BE-8D04-C46DC4FFD6B0 47ACF625-4F24-4613-9C4E-5E81CABE1FBA FB57FEB0-874D-4585-BF2D-FAAE8EBC17F6 AD97905C-02C9-4A07-9EEA-DA1F36CC7FA8 8727CDE7-CFD1-40EA-A8AF-256882E677CA B052573C-CEE4-4CD1-B86F-C9CB0202622C 1FDA88B9-6396-4BE0-B01D-4DC4FA38A632 6CD0F19E-3C61-44FC-9723-C7737416CD7C 62D3F811-1C6C-477C-972B-FE52539070FC•• 1FAE3C2F-8600-47BE-8D04-C46DC4FFD6B0 47ACF625-4F24-4613-9C4E-5E81CABE1FBA FB57FEB0-874D-4585-BF2D-FAAE8EBC17F6 EF459BAF-1347-4C71-9008-BDB3136FCCE8 3BB10396-3999-4821-82D8-3568DE598D06 F3D95CB7-5CF3-4B27-8B55-AA78EDF89759 63057605-E453-4FDE-89BC-ABD2BC6600E2 Views 6CD0F19E-3C61-44FC-9723-C7737416CD7C
    image image

    High yield: three myths debunked

    High yield: three myths debunked

    January 20, 2022 Fixed income

    High yield corporate credit has emerged as one of our asset class picks for 2022 (see: Credit - the asset class to watch for the mid cycle). Further, we believe key myths around the market help create mispricing opportunities that investors can take advantage of.


    Myth 1: Default rates are between 3% and 5%

    (Reality: Default rates have averaged 1.5% pa)

    Many will be surprised to learn that the Bloomberg US High Yield Corporate Index1 has only seen an average 1.5% pa default rate over the last 15 years (Figure 1).

    Figure 1: US high yield default rates have been a lot lower than you may think2


    Historically, it has required a financial crisis (such as the start of the pandemic in March 2020 or the 2008 crisis) for US default rates to approach 4% or above. In 2021, defaults were the lowest in 15 years.

    As such, assuming conservative recovery rates of ~40%, in line with the long-term average , high yield credit spreads have generally been priced to overcompensate for default risks (Figure 2).

    Figure 2: US high yield spreads have offered compensation for default risks4


    Rating agencies report higher default rates

    The high yield default rates investors are used to hearing from the ratings agencies are typically 3% to 5% on average, and much higher during periods of stress (Figure 3).

    Figure 3: Rating agencies have reported higher default rates5


    Ratings agency default analytics are not based on the high yield indices that investors are most likely to be exposed to, but the entire population of corporates for whom they have assigned a credit rating.

    We believe these broader default samples are useful for top-down macro-level analysis or modelling. However, for high yield investors concerned about compensation for risk, index defaults have more direct relevance.

    This is equivalent to how a climate scientist would never solely focus on global average temperatures to understand climate dynamics in the arctic – where temperatures are rising twice as fast.

    Myth 2: High yield vulnerable to rising rates

    (Reality: High yield returns have been positive in rising rate environments)

    Since 2005, there have been seven periods in which 10-year Treasury yields have risen by ~1% or more (see: High yield corporates have behaved well during rising rates).

    US high yield markets have consistently delivered positive total returns through each of these seven periods (Figure 4).

    Figure 4: US high yield corporates have delivered positive returns during rising yield environments6


    On average high yield returned close to 15% during these periods, or 7.5% when excluding the outlier of 2009, (when markets were rebounding from the 2008 crisis).

    High yield is more naturally resilient to rising rates

    High yield has less interest rate (or ‘duration’) risk than government or investment grade bonds, as high yield tends to be shorter dated on average.

    Further, bond yields on high yield credit are mostly comprised of credit spread (Figure 5).

    Figure 5: High yield bond have historically been driven more by credit spreads than interest rates7


    As such, changes in credit spreads have had more of an impact on high yield returns than changes in interest rates.

    This is particularly important because interest rates and credit spreads tend to be negatively correlated (Figure 6). This is because central banks typically raise interest rates when the economy is growing, which is good for corporate balance sheets, and therefore credit spreads.

    Figure 6: High yield credit spreads have been negatively correlated with their benchmark Treasury bond yields8


    As such, when rates have risen, gains from credit spreads narrowing have heavily outweighed losses from interest rate risk (Figure 7).

    Figure 7: Positive credit spread returns have far outweighed negative interest rate returns9


    Myth 3: Liquidity is impossible to source

    (Reality: Specialists can tap ‘hidden liquidity’ from the ETF ecosystem)

    For most market participants, two-way liquidity in the high yield market did indeed deteriorate rapidly following the 2008 financial crisis, as new banking sector regulations took hold, making it less attractive for market makers to hold large inventories of bonds on their books.

    As bonds are almost universally traded over-the-counter, one bond at a time, two-way liquidity became harder to source, particularly during times of market stress when the number of sellers overwhelmed buyers, exacerbating price swings.

    Other investors have found new sources of liquidity

    However, after the 2008 crisis the fixed income ETF market developed rapidly, providing a new source of bond market liquidity (see: A better way to generate beta in fixed income? for more).

    Skilled investors experienced within the fixed income ETF ecosystem were therefore able to unlock ‘hidden liquidity’ within the ‘create and redeem’ feature, similar to the programmatic trading that has been a staple of the equity market for decades.

    It has opened the door to trading large, customized baskets of bonds within hours for relatively low trading costs. In our experience, market makers even prefer trading diversified bond baskets because they can hedge them more efficiently and cost effectively.

    Figure 8: The ETF ecosystem offers the potential to execute highly liquid basket trades10


    In our view, this type of trading can help investors target alpha within smaller and traditionally less liquid issuers. Investors can also aim to eliminate much of the drag on returns imposed by high transaction costs.

    High yield — the asset class to watch for 2022?

    In our view, high yield corporate credit is emerging as one of the key asset classes to watch for 2022.

    The global economy is transitioning from the rapid "early cycle" rebound, to a more moderate "mid-cycle" trajectory. In our words, GDP is shifting from "very high" to "high".

    Whereas this has traditionally suited equities less (sometimes leading to a dreaded "mid-cycle adjustment"), moderating growth has historically been a sweet spot for high yield credit on average (Figure 9).

    Figure 9: Moderating growth environments are the potential sweetspot for high yield11


    We believe, this is because corporates are less likely to raise leverage (with the aim of maximizing equity growth) when GDP is moderating, while rising revenues and corporate profitability continue to generally improve the creditworthiness of corporate borrowers.

    As such, it could be a compelling time for investors to partner with managers able to overcome the high yield market’s liquidity challenges, with the ability to fully understand and price market risks.

    Watch Insight's Efficient Beta team explore these common high yield myths in our recent webinar.

    Back to top