Global Fixed Income and Insurance Portfolios | Insight Investment

Welcome back to the home of the world's smartest money. This is the insurance aum.com podcast. Insurance asset management is unlike any other investment discipline. That's why in collaboration with the institutes, we developed the Chartered Insurance Investment Manager or CIIM designation, the new standard for insurance investment professionals. CIIM is the first designation designed specifically for insurance asset management, delivering practical real world education for both early career professionals, building their foundation and experienced leaders looking to deepen their practice. All CIIM courses are a hundred percent online and designed to fit into your busy professional schedules. 

To learn more about CIIM or to enroll, visit theinstitutes.org/designations or reach out to sales@theinstitutes.org. Welcome to another edition of the insuranceaum.com podcast. Commercial Real estate investors like to buy everything when it feels really good and sell everything when it feels really bad. So many people were looking for a recession and that just hasn't happened. In the last 18 to 24 months, we've created more data that all of humanity before it. We're coming into 2026 on pretty solid footing. My name's Stuart Foley, I'll be your host. 

Hey, welcome back to the home of the world's smartest money on the insuranceaum.com podcast. My name's Stuart Foley, I'll be your host and we're thrilled to have you along today. Today is a very interesting podcast. It's on global fixed income and insurance portfolios. Today I am joined by Brendan Murphy, CFA, Head of Fixed Income North America at Insight Investment and Jim Kaniclides, CFA, Head of US Insurance and Senior Portfolio Manager. Brendan oversees implementation across US core, core plus, multi-sector rates, mortgages, insurance and investment grade strategies, and serves as lead portfolio manager for the global aggregate strategy. 

Jim leads portfolio management and solutions designed for Insight's US insurance clients and has spent decades focused specifically on insurance balance sheet management. Brendan, Jim, welcome to the podcast. Thank you Stuart. Thanks Stuart. We're thrilled to have you. Thrilled to for you to be here. We're looking forward to a great education today on Global Fixed. Before we get going too far, we start 'em all the same way, which is can you tell us each where you grew up, what was your high school mascot and what job would you like to have, if not the one you're in today? 

Jim, we'll start with you. Sure. I grew up in a little map.town in Ohio called Ashtabula. Wow, there you go. I've not heard of that. I have not heard of that town in, in Ohio. Not many People have heard of it unless you just sort of drive by it off the highway. Yeah, no. High School mascot was a lion and job I'd like to have, you know, I'm thinking about this a lot more, Stuart. because I think AI's coming for me. So if I had the talent and skill, I think I would own a restaurant. 

Wow. There you go. I've owned one. I learned three rules. One is don't get into the restaurant business. And the second one is remember rule number one and the third one is remember rule number two, like it was so difficult. I have so much respect for people who have successful restaurants because it is so hard. It is so hard. But anyway, I digress. Brendan, how about you, a hometown high school mascot. What job would you like to have, if not this one? Sure. So my hometown is a small town in Connecticut called Wallingford, Connecticut, which is kind of midway between Hartford and New Haven. 

I know Wallingford there, there was a go-kart track in Wallingford, a good indoor go-kart track that we would go to in the winter when it was real cold and we couldn't race, couldn't road race. We'd all go down there and uh, I'd, so I've been to Wallingford a a few different times. Nice. Yeah, it's a great town. So, um, I grew up in walling for Connecticut, so I uh, high school mascot is actually called the Judges. So I went to private school in Wallingford, which is actually more of a boarding school. 

So that was an interesting experience in and of itself, being a day student at a boarding school. But judges is the nickname. It's a little bit lame, doesn't exactly intimidate fear into the opposition, but it that so be it. That was our mascot. And then in terms of jobs I'd like to have, and this is as I get older, I've been thinking this through about things that I could do in my second life and, and one when I have come in my, I've got three kids, the youngest of which is, is just got her driver's license. 

And I'm shocked at how difficult it is to get a driver's license for kids. And I'm like, I think there's a market at least in Massachusetts for more driving schools because there seems to be a shortage of instructors and there's all kinds of kids looking to drive. So I, I think that's my, my second career if I get the opportunity is running a driving school. I think there's something to that and I will say I believe there are state differences. I believe that the way I think that best practices in Massachusetts and best practices where I live in Texas are probably somewhat different. 

I can imagine that I Can, there's a number of reasons why people do not blow the horn and flip you off in Texas and they don't. And there's good reason for that. But, so let's start right off here and talk about the global bond market and framing the opportunity. My question is to Brendan, let's start with the big picture. When we say global fixed income, what are we really talking about in terms of size, structure and the opportunity set? Sure, I mean it's an interesting one because I think to be honest, I think US investors, particularly in the fixed income space, are a bit spoiled. 

And what, what do I mean by that? I mean when you look at the US fixed income markets, they're exceptionally deep and diverse in terms of the access you can get to different types of, of instruments. And when you talk about the US and the context of global, it's interesting that the US is only about one third of the overall global universe, if you will. And you know, when I talk to clients in non-US countries where domestic fixed income markets are much smaller, their default is to think of global because their domestic markets aren't developed enough basically, right, to rely on that. 

So to get proper diversification benefits, right? They think of global as the natural, natural first step. US investors are tend to be more skeptical about it, right? They think about fixed income. This is the safe part of my asset allocation mix. I got a lot of options in the US why would I ever wanna do global? Isn't that riskier quote unquote, right? And do I really wanna take more risk with my fixed income component? And the reality is what we found is if you introduce that diversification level, remember you saw this particularly in years like 2021 and 22 when the Fed was raising rates aggressively, that to be diversified in terms of your central bank exposure if you will, and have exposure more globally really helped from a total return perspective. 

And a common sort of misnomer around global is that if you look at particularly developed markets, the the US is a relatively high yielder, right? Compared to other developed markets. The nuance to it though is when you hedge the currency risk associated with places like Europe, Japan, the UK who have lower nominal yields, you actually pick up a lot of carry by hedging back into the dollar because US short rates are, are so much higher than in these other countries. So Japan for example, when you hedge a JGB back into the dollar, you pick up like 300 basis points in terms of carry, on that hedge, which is quite significant. 

So you know, when people look at a JGB, which a 30 year JGB, which has been in the news recently, 3.41 is what you see on your screen. The reality is on a hedge basis you get something more like 6.41 when you hedge it back. And when you compare that to what you get in the US, which is about 4.7% today, obviously significant pickup, different level risks, right? Different diversification get out of it, but potentially using hedging, which people typically when they hear hedging typically think, oh my god, I'm hedging what, what's that? 

What's it gonna cost me to hedge? And in a lot of cases in global markets you can hedge reduce risk and actually increase yield, increase return. It's interesting because I was thinking the way you were talking about, which is hedging costs me money. And that's an interesting point that hedging in this case is positive carry and not a little bit, I mean 300 basis points is like, you know, when the basis is 300 basis points, a lot of, you know, it's a lot like on a relative basis. 

Right? And and and on top of the comment, I've got a question for you and for, so I kind of have the same perception about the US that the US fixed income market is significantly more developed in terms of its diversification and different things that can be securitized, but that's a fairly limited not on much data. How would you compare the evolution of fixed income markets in the US versus others if you can do it at a, with big crayons? Well, I think the reality is, particularly in the credit space, well there's two things that are gonna drive supply in debt markets. 

And one is the sovereign dynamics which are frankly abysmal for everyone. Pretty much, right? Everyone, everyone's issued more sovereign debt, right? So that's becoming bigger parts of those universes and those governments need to figure out how to, how to fund that. But the insatiable demand has been on the credit side and that's where I'd say part of it is the way that the financing markets work. IE in the US corporations and entities are just more comfortable securing financing through, through the bond markets, right? Whereas they're using interbank channels in Europe and other places and maybe something different in, in places like Asia. 

So the US has definitely been at the forefront from an issuance perspective and a diversification perspective. And that buyer base has, has moved along with that. So, you know, I don't really see that changing anytime in the near future to be honest with you. I think the US is always gonna be the leader from the credit perspective. But again, that diversification can work in multiple ways. One is your credit diversification where by taking advantage of some of those opportunities in Australia, Europe, UK, whatever, right? You're diversifying entities, but you can also diversify your interest rate risk. 

And that's important in a world where central banks are gonna be correlated, but potentially some zigging when others are zagging, right? When the US is hiking, maybe Japan's not, maybe they're cutting or maybe they're, they're staying put. Or conversely, if there's a big slowdown, the US may be cutting more aggressively, right? Than other central banks. So that diversification of rate exposure and credit exposure should be thought of I think when you think about the holistic allocation. That's super helpful, thank you. So let's kind of, the next item up for a bit here is the, is how insurers actually invest globally, and this is to you Jim, how much of US insurers assets are actually invested outside the US today? 

It's a really small amount, Stuart. If we look at data that the NAIC aggregates and reports, it's only about 3% of invested assets. So it's tiny looking deeper below that. Now that's all foreign investments. So looking deeper down to the next level, most of that is fixed income, about 85% of that. And then if we dig down below that, most of that is actually in corporate bonds. So this gets to sort of the, the thirst for yield that insurers have and about 85% of the fixed income is in corporate bonds. 

The other interesting note is that most of that is investment grade. So more than 90% of that fixed income is investment grade bonds. So you know, they're not looking to high yield in large parts, they're not looking to add what I would say add credit risk with respect to, you know, we think about public ratings or capital charges. They're doing all of this within the context of what I would consider is kind of a core allocation, but it's really small. So there's a big opportunity to, we think, to add, uh, exposure. 

And if I combine your number with Brendan's, 97% of the insurance market is invested in one third of the global possible bond market, right? That's a where I'm coming from is you said that the US is something like a third of the global market and then you know, Jim's saying that only 3% of it's uh, invested outside the US, So I'm kind of putting some numbers together there. But does that, am I kind of halfway right there? Our audience is only hoping for me to halfway right by the way. 

Yeah, no hundred. I think you're a hundred percent right. Okay. Wow. Let's, okay. Alright, listen, I'm on a roll, I'm gonna keep going. So let's talk a little bit about strategies for accessing global markets. And this one's really to Brendan, how are insurers able, how can I invest if I'm a CIO and I want gain some global exposure? And, and to your point, like outside the US the global market is actually thought of as, as de-risking, right? And in the US we don't necessarily think about it that way. 

So how, if I'm gonna, if I'm an insurer, how do I do it? Yeah, so pretty much, you know, all the typical flavors you'd get within US, fixed income we can offer in global format. So for us, the main product would be global aggregate for example. So we actually run things that we call global core, global core plus, similar to what you do US core, US core plus. And it's really very similar just using the global aggregate as an index instead of the US aggregate. And that same one third two third ratio holds true. 

So you get global ag, you get everything that's in the US ag, but then you also get two thirds of exposure to these other sovereigns and credit markets in the developed market space. It's got a similar investment grade only, right? BBB- or better. And it looks and smells very much like a US core, core plus portfolio. When you hedge that currency risk, except you have much bigger diversification, potentially bigger alpha opportunities for an active manager that's managing in that space. And then the corollaries are all gonna be the same, right? 

If you want something that's global securitized or global high yield global credit is a popular product that we have as well where it's primarily US and European investment grade. So you can essentially take just about any of the typical products you'd find in the US space, redefine them as global. You're still gonna have, you know, the US is probably the biggest portion of those indices, but much more diversification by expanding the universe to global in nature. That's super helpful, thank you. So let's turn to yield in relative value. 

So in this one, I'm coming back to you Brendan, if you will. How do global yields compare to US bonds today across developed and emerging markets and across government, corporate, and high yield sectors? And here's a like, here's a fact check for me. For me, I remember I was running money during the European debt crisis and like Greek debt was like, forget it, like nobody wanted it last time I checked it traded inside of us, US treasuries. Talk to us about the global yields in the US bond market today. 

Can you get us current on what those relationships actually are? Sure, happy to. And it obviously it's gonna vary through time, right? So there's not a, in any given cycle, you're gonna see rates move a hundred basis points high, a hundred basis points low, probably relative to each other depending on where they are in their interest rate cycle monetary policy cycle. So current, if you look at the current environment, you have us 10 year treasuries around 4%. Germany is about 2 75, UK is a little bit higher at 4.4%, Japan's a bit lower at 2.1%. 

Australia's about four 70, so a bit higher than the US. So the US is sort of in the middle to higher end sort of of that range. Now, this is where it gets a little confusing is just on that, that hedge component. So Japan, which I told you 2.1% for the 10 year, but again, when you hedge that Japanese bond back, you're picking up 3%. Why are you picking up 3%? Because the short rates in Japan and the US are 3% apart, right? So in other words, Japan's closer to one, the US is closer to four, right? 

In terms of short rates. So when I hedge it back, I pick up that three. So that means the JGB at 2.1 plus the 3%, I get a 5.1 hedge yield, decent pickup, almost a hundred basis points higher than I get in the US. And you people typically be like, well, well how does that work? Why does that? And it's really all about the shapes of the yield curves and the Japanese yield curve is much steeper than the US yield curve. So you hedge at the short end of the curve and then you lock in the investment in the 10 year, the third year or further out the curve. 

So it really depends through time, it really depends what the hedging costs are. The hedging costs can move if the fed is cutting rates aggressively that you'll get that hedge right now, but you may not be earning that a year from now if they cut rates aggressively over the course of the next year. Vice versa. If Japan's raising rates aggressively, it'll go against you. So the beauty of it is from an active standpoint, right? We have all these different levers that we can pull to try to figure out where central banks are in the cycle to manage around central banks that are hiking aggressively or to avoid them in portfolios, right? 

And favor ones that are cutting or much easier in terms of their monetary policy. Yeah, it's, it's interesting. It's the one thing we can always guarantee, right Brendan? Is, is, is that is change, right? That's right. I mean for most of us that's, it keeps you in the game for all these years, right? It is like, I don't know what's gonna happen tomorrow, but I can tell you it's not gonna be the same as today. And for some, however big those events are are small, it's gonna impact the markets one way or the other. 

And it just, it just happens. It's just the way it is. I think Stuart, if you think about it simplistically, these are all developed markets that have reasonable correlation, right? The economies are relatively synced, the central banks are somewhat synced, right? They're experiencing similar growth and inflation challenges with some exceptions, but the magnitude's different and the response function is gonna be different, right? There's certain central banks may be more proactively tackling inflation, others may be less aggressive, right? So that creates the relative value dynamics that offer active managers potential value. 

Yeah, that's perfect. So thank you so much. All right, so let's shift over to portfolio construction for insurers and this, this one's going to Jim. Jim, how should insurers think about incorporating global bonds into their portfolios? Stuart, you know, from your podcast topics and the trends in that, that insurers are looking for yield and anything private has been the hot topic and we've seen real strong growth in those asset classes, but they're really looking, they, they look for yield anywhere they can get it and you know, 10 years ago within the US fixed income markets, there were pockets of illiquidity. 

I would say that insurers were happy to take advantage of things like taxable municipal bonds where you know, high quality, but you could get paid a little bit more for illiquidity insurers. I think now one of the things within investment grade allocations insurers are doing is pushing into structured markets and making bigger allocations there. And they're happy to accept and have to deal with the complexity and the modeling risk in those with global, it's still an investment grade asset class, so there aren't higher risk-based capital charges than they're getting within their investment grade US fixed income portfolios. 

So we do think it fits within core allocation. It's not what we would call, or many would call a risk allocation that requires capital higher, capital charges. So you could do this within your core allocation and you're accepting if with respect to accounting treatment, which we haven't talked about, but you're accepting a bit more complexity with accounting treatment. Brendan's talked about hedging the exposure and the hedged yields. Insurers can get hedged accounting treatment for it, which is more favorable for them, but there is a bit more work involved to do that now I think most insurance accounting vendors can support that. 

So I don't, I don't think that's a big hurdle, but I would say this is just another way for, uh, US insurers to think about opportunities to add yield without having to push out into more risk asset classes. Yeah, it makes sense. And I, I've got, my next question really comes from a LinkedIn poll that I did, which is asking our audience what question would they like me to add? And this is it either one of you or both. What scenario would create headwinds for a global fixed income allocation for an insurance portfolio? 

In other words, gimme the scenario where I decide to invest globally and it doesn't work out for me. What, what has to happen? Sure. So from my perspective, the main thing is the rate risk, right? So I, I referenced the 21/22 environment because that was one where global worked quite well. It was one where you had a super aggressive fed hiking rates, other central banks, mainly Asian ones weren't doing anything essentially, right? So, so that balance, that diversification really helped you in a rising rate environment where it could go against you in a relative basis is the, the converse of that one where let's say we're facing a, a global recession, the Fed is cutting rates aggressively for whatever reason, we're going back to 1% interest rates on the front end. 

That's one where the US is probably gonna be a really good performer in a global context compared to some of these other markets that don't need to cut as much because rates are already lower. And that's not necessarily a bad environment from a total return perspective, you'll do well, you just would've been better off probably if you were in the US relatively speaking. So that'd be the one that I, that I'd point to. That's super helpful. Alright, Jim, last one here before we get, we got a couple fun ones for you, but are there other considerations that insurers ought to keep in mind when they're investing globally? 

Yeah, Stuart, I mentioned the accounting one. I think that frightens off some investors. I think they don't understand the hedged yields that Brendan explained. There is, as I mentioned, some additional accounting complexity to it. But I think, you know, in our world today that's, that shouldn't be a big hurdle. There are, uh, state statutory limits on foreign exposure, but those generally range from 10 to 20% depending on the state. So there's plenty of room to add based on the numbers we saw from the NAIC was such a low exposure in the aggregate. 

And there are also some states also have limits on individual countries beneath that aggregate exposure of 10 to 20%. So I think those are some of the considerations for insurance companies, but as I, as I've said, I, I think those are easily surmountable and, you know, make this, I think make a lot of sense for their core allocations. It's been super helpful and, and had a great education today on global fixed income. I managed to learn a few things along the way here too, and which is, you know, always helpful. 

I mean, I, you know, one of the things that we did, we, we put together CIIM is we had to, we had to go find 40 subject matter experts because nobody knows the entire landscape of this business. And every time I have an asset class specialist or some subject matter expert on, I get to have a little bit more education too. So I wanna say thank you to both of you. The one question that we've been asking of late, it really attempts to get at the culture at Insight Investment and it goes something like this. 

What characteristics, and, and not only for your, your time now, but also you've both been at other places and you've been at this for a minute, what characteristics do you look for when you're adding to members of your team? Brendan, I'll, I'll take this one to you and, and just what characteristics are you looking for when you're interviewing? So I'll start with a little bit on Insight Investment, which is what I would describe as a, a specialist fixed income manager, right? So we only do fixed income. 

It's very much a specialist model, so we're looking for deep subject matter experts. Jim would be one for insurance, right? I'd be one for global, whether it's corporate credit securitized markets, right? We're looking for deep subject matter experts that know that go as deep as possible and understand everything there is to know about those worlds. Now that's a great model in and of itself. I think the challenge of it, and this is what I look for, is obviously we want subject matter experts, but we also want subject matter experts that can work across teams. 

I think if you create that specialist model too far, you end up with a bunch of silos, uh, that do well, right? With someone that wants a single sector type product. But when you're trying to create multi-sector products and you need that cooperation, collaboration, being able to work across teams, that's something that I greatly value, particularly from my oversight function within the firm. So I want someone that is gonna be a deep subject matter expert, but is also interested in how other teams are put together and willing to work with them, right? 

To create multi-sector products which are gonna resonate with clients and not just sort of in their own bubble, working in their own space. So expert and a team player, team collaborator that I'm trying to Identify. That's awesome. Alright, with, when we have two guests, our last question goes like this. You can have dinner with up to four people, including the two of you, so you each get one guest dinner's on us. I always say that we have a new owner, but, and nobody's yelled at me yet, but in this hypothetical dinner, you can have one guest, it can be anyone alive or dead. 

So I went to Brendan first last time. Jim, I'll come to you. Who would you most like to have dinner with? Alive or dead? Well, Stuart, you kind of ruined my pick. Oh no, I'm gonna go. You gonna, I'm gonna go with it anyways, and it's probably someone, you know, given your, uh, locale. My guest would be Aaron Franklin. Do you know Aaron Franklin? No. Aaron Franklin runs what many believe and has been rated as well as the, the top rated barbecue joint in The, oh, there you go. 

So this again, along the lines of needing a second career, but I also took his masterclass on barbecue and mine doesn't turn out like his, I think he left a few things out that I'd like to talk to him about. That's interesting because there's a place near us that got voted best barbecue in Texas. And I'll tell you what, it is some stiff competition down here. There's a lot of folks that really take it seriously, but that's a, it's an interesting one. There's, it's, that's from my perspective, super cool. 

All right, Brendan, how about you? Who's, who's joining Jim, the king of all barbecue and you, uh, who's, who's the lucky fourth All? So I'm gonna start with this. I'm so, I'm a bond nerd, number one, but I'm a baseball nerd. Number two is what I'll say. So, and I'm a big believer in the baseball as a metaphor for life thing, if you will. Right? This idea that being successful, you know, is, is only being successful one third of the time is you're the greatest player ever. 

And that two thirds of the time you're failing the fact that the seasons are so long and that there're a bear to go through the nuance, all the subtleties that go into it. My daughter and I actually, the same daughter I referenced with driving lessons we're on a mission to see every major league, baseball park in the US Oh, that's cool. Which has been a really fun thing to do, an educational thing to do. And we had about six or seven more to go. So all that said, right, I'm, I'm setting up for my pick is David Ortiz. 

Wow. Why David Ortiz? A because I'm in Boston, right? And I think he's a tremendous player. B, never have I seen a more clutch player that, that that's why I'd like to have dinner with him, to meet him is just to understand how you can be so clutch in a sport like that. Right. Which is so built around failure. That's always super impressed me. And he just seems like a super fun guy that I think would enjoy barbecue as well. It'd be my guest him. Yeah. 

So I think we'd have a great time. I gotta think that you, you better go on the family plan there. I mean, there's gonna be, there's gonna be some food consumed before. Well, We're not paying for it Stewart. That's Right. So, you know, yeah, that was my, yeah, I, I kind of, I kind of hung myself there, didn't I? So, uh, listen, thanks so much for being on. I really appreciate you both and you know, certainly we've benefited from your expertise, so thanks so much for being on. 

Thank you Stuart. Thanks Stuart. We've been joined today by Brendan Murphy, CFA Head of fixed income at North America Insight Investment, and Jim Kaniclides, CFA Head of US Insurance and Senior Portfolio Manager, if you like, what we're both at Insight Investment. Sorry, I should have mentioned that. If you like what we're doing, please rate us and review us on Apple Podcast, Spotify, or you listen to your favorite shows. It means a lot to us. We look at the ratings, we appreciate the comments, and in all sincerity, it matters. 

And we also, this one is not a video podcast, but oftentimes they are. And you can catch it on our YouTube channel at Insurance, a UM community. My name's Stuart Foley, I've been your host. This is the Home of the world's Smartest Money and insuranceaum.com.